Thursday, June 19, 2008

"Fighting evil, so you don't have to."

It isn't often that a decent show appears in the summer television schedules. Relegation to the off-season can be a sign that the show isn't good enough attract viewers during the regular TV season. Or it may simply be too offbeat for the same. These are swiftly-cancelled filler, disappearing without complaint or quirky annoying peanut-posting campaigns. Then there are those which defy expectations. Bona fide hits, such as Mad Men, are rare; the more likely route to longevity is to become a cult favourite. ABC Family's The Middleman seems destined—indeed, designed—to fit snugly into this last category. Too goofy for the mainstream, it's also hampered by a budget that even the most basic of basic cable hour-longs might be ashamed of. But what it has in spades is charm and a lack of preciousness which lifts it above the unoriginal premise and similar, more self-consciously offbeat fare. Enough, at least, to ensure it finds a niche populated by kids looking for a clever actioner that doesn't speak down to them, and by older kids and adults charmed by a mix of pop culture references both familiar enough to evoke Buffy and its contemporaries, and obscure enough to make them feel smart.

On paper it seems to hold little promise: "A young woman is recruited by a secret agency to fight against evil forces." More Men in Black than Buffy, it nevertheless offers little variation on the age-old trope. A world of aliens and monsters (and superintelligent, genetically-engineered primates) coexisting alongside the world of men. Sometimes peacefully, other times less so. And we all know what happens when someone from the outside discovers this secret world. As website TV Tropes puts it:
Beware, if you are discovered breaking the masquerade, you must either become part of it, or join those who fight or police it.
And that's pretty much what we have here. Wendy (Natalie Morales) is a geeky temp secretary who during one posting is attacked by what she describes as a "hentai tentacle monster". The beast is dealt with by an implacable stranger, the eponymous "Middleman" (Matt Keeslar), who fights evil using an array of whizzy gadgets supplied by an unknown power. Impressed by Wendy's poise in unusual circumstances ("95% of people would fill their shorts and be eaten"), he offers her a job as his apprentice/sidekick.



The Middleman doesn't wear its influences on its sleeve so much as have them tattooed on its face. Indeed, the pilot is a Frankenstein's Monster of Someone Else's Ideas. But what judicious employment of these concepts allows is room for the dialogue and characters to percolate without having to spend too long explaining the set-up. And while it doesn't subvert the trope entirely, it does undermine it with clever digs at both its own and the genre's preposterousness ("that belonged to my father, who disappeared in mysterious and as-yet-unexplained circumstances") and via the fourth wall-breaking captions. The dialogue is equally sly, assaulting the viewer with pop culture references and rat-a-tat sparring modelled after a classic screwball comedy. Morales' delivery is perfect: rapid-fire and deadpan, she's more Garofolo than Gellar, though hotter and geekier than both. Keeslar, channelling Dudley Do-Right and Constable Benton Fraser—shit, how amazing would Paul Gross be in this part?—isn’t quite so confident, but his might be the harder role: a former Navy Seal, the character is written as an endearing throwback to a more innocent time, ruthless, intelligent and maybe a little dim—all at the same time. And all the while spouting goshdang-it-to-heck dialogue (he never swears, except when he does).

But if the show seldom pauses long enough to allow appreciation some of the more delicious lines, nor does it allow reflection on its weaker moments; the throw-everything-at-the-viewer approach is the verbal equivalent of the visual gags in an Airplane!-style spoof; if you hear a bad line, it's OK because there'll be a quite splendid one along in just a minute. Only a few moments spoil the party: a series of gangster film quotations that not once stray from the obvious (The Godfather, Scarface—would something from White Heat have been amiss?), and a Planet of the Apes reference which I'm surprised didn't get left on The Simpsons' cutting-room floor where they found it. The show runs out of breath halfway through when Wendy's boyfriend reappears, a boring dick undeserving of both his screen time and Wendy's forgiveness. But it gets its second wind as it approaches a denouement marred only by the obvious deficiencies in the budget.

So ignore that, throw in a ridiculously human robot with a prickly demeanour, and a black-and-white aside that ends with an image of the Middleman holding an umbrella and Wendy wearing a scuba mask, and you're left with what has the potential to be one of the oddest and smartest shows you'll see this summer.


Labels: , ,

Responses to “The Middleman” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Friday, March 07, 2008

THERE IS NO RENEWAL!

Responses to “I Believe This Is Customary” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Tuesday, September 25, 2007

Jindabyne

I've no problem with films which are stacked with characters who are thoroughly unlikable; what I find less easy to cope with are ones in which the characters all thoroughly unlikable idiots.

We watched this underwhelming two-hour slog based solely upon Mark Kermode's glowing recommendation.

Thanks, Kermode. THERMODE.

Responses to “Capsule film reviews: Jindabyne” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Monday, August 13, 2007

So I'm back from one week spent holidaying in the French Republic. In fact I've been back six days, but it's not as if anyone has this place permanently loaded in their browser, crabbed hand hovering over the refresh button. I would hope.

As it is, I had intended to do a series of posts about Wot I Did on My Holiday, a kind of Monday, Tuesday, Wednesday thing, etc., not only filled with my profound musings on our encounters with the Frencher psyche and culture, but also bursting with the minutiae of our daily activities.

But that would be fucking insufferable, so I'll instead mention just a couple things which stuck in my mind about the trip.

Driving on the Other Side of the Road

Time spent worrying about Having to Drive on the Other Side of the Road is a peculiarly British obsession. "Oooh, how did you cope, having to driiive on the other side of the roaaaad?" I've now been asked about twenty billion times. However! For the curious amongst you, or for those who are plain apprehensive about having to do in the future and require advice, I now offer a simple one-step guide to Driving on the Other Side of the Road:

You just drive. On the other side. Of the fucking road.

There's no special trick to it, no great mystery. It really is that simple. Still unconvinced? Then by all means print this page off if you want, to keep with your Google Maps route printout in the glove compartment for ease of reference. Y'know, should you ever have any trouble. Driving on the other side of the fucking road.

Now go away and never ask me this again or I'll chop your fucking feet off.

The "Bloody" French

In defiance of stereotype, every single Frencher we met was exceedingly courteous and gracious. And therefore incredibly irritating: before our holiday I'd spent several weeks doing a crash course in Frenchspeak by former professional Nazi-buster and all-round superhero, Michel Thomas. In fact, I'd got quite good at it, and I was looking forward to impressing those we met with my l33t language skills. I was looking forward to discussing la situation politique with our neighbours, to having conversations somewhat more in depth than asking the location of the nearest supermarket in a VERY LOUD VOICE.

Only no. I couldn't. Because almost without exception, whenever I opened my trap to spurt out some well-considered (if strongly accented) statement or question, the person I was speaking to would reply in English. In better English than my French, I had no doubt, so it would therefore have been impolite of me to insist on speaking French and holding up the conversation for longer than strictly necessary. Fuckers. If I were a xenophobe I'd suspect some kind of cultural superiority complex was at play. Good job I'm not then, oh no. No siree.

So apart from mentioning that I spent a good portion of our last day with my hands inside the u-bend of the toilet, I'll leave it more or less at that. Though to offset the white-van-man musings of the above and to end on a more positive note, rather brilliantly, our holiday coincided with the nearest large town's annual medieval festival:

Getting into the swing of things (ho ho):

The castle grounds featured as the centerpiece to the festival:

My good lady:

Responses to “Le Retour” (2)

  1. # At 4:39 PM, August 15, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous wrote:

    Do you have to swear so much?
     

  2. # At 11:44 AM, August 17, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    You're right. Upon re-reading it, I can see that my post contains too many instances of the word "fucking." Precisely ONE too many, in fact.
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Monday, July 30, 2007

Je vais en France demain. Je reviens en une semaine.

Au revioir!

Responses to “Vacances” (1)

  1. # At 8:20 AM, March 20, 2008, Anonymous flats wrote:

    Ohhh But listen, do you really like frenchies? Cose, I love´em, in fact Im married with one of them, We´ve met in Lyon 2 years ago...the best 2 years of my life...regards!
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Wednesday, July 11, 2007

We make life miserable for ourselves and others so that death doesn't seem such a terrifying concept. To make the world a better place, to achieve understanding of ourselves and the universe, to live in peace and harmony with one another in joy would be to strengthen the blow of our eventual mortality.

We make a habit of it; indeed, of everything, when habit and routine are nothing but lies, designed to fool us into thinking that something is lasting, when in fact nothing is.

On and on, until maximum entropy has been achieved, life is extinguished and the final black holes have evaporated; until all matter that once made up the galaxies has degenerated, and the lowly photon is king of the universe.

Still, if the second law of thermodynamics is good for nothing else, it at least enables you to superchill your drink in two minutes.


Responses to “The Last Question” (5)

  1. # At 2:49 PM, July 12, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous wrote:

    Funny thing for a man with OCD to say about habits.
     

  2. # At 2:49 PM, July 13, 2007, Anonymous Shirley Maclean wrote:

    The last question is, of course, "Where are you going". I'm not sure "superchilling a coke in two minutes" is an acceptable answer.
     

  3. # At 3:00 PM, July 13, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    INSUFFICIENT DATA FOR A MEANINGFUL ANSWER.
     

  4. # At 11:59 PM, July 13, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous wrote:

    ????
     

  5. # At 9:58 AM, July 14, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    Sigh.

    From: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Last_Question

    "The Last Question is a science fiction short story by Isaac Asimov...This story deals with the development of a computer called Multivac and its relationship with humanity through the course of seven historic settings...In each of the first six scenes a character presents the [ever more advanced] computer with the question, 'Can entropy, be reversed?'...In each case [but the last] the computer replies with, 'insufficient data for a meaningful answer'."
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Monday, July 02, 2007

Groupthink

Now available via your high-speed internet tubes, pictures from the tenth-anniversary Trans-Ice Internet Meet (TIIM)-based brainstorming session, 30th June 2007 @ The Bricklayer's Arms in London's fashionable London.

Click on the picture above, or follow the link here for more.

EDIT: Link fixed, thanks.

Responses to “That Time Again” (6)

  1. # At 3:02 PM, July 02, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous wrote:

    What a bunch of freaks and geeks.
     

  2. # At 9:44 AM, July 03, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    And you wonder why I don't invite you along.
     

  3. # At 8:27 PM, July 04, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous wrote:

    So you did think it was me.
     

  4. # At 10:06 PM, July 04, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    Maybe if you didn't persist in commenting anonymously (and if I didn't have a policy of not checking the IP addresses of my visitors, I guess), I wouldn't make that mistake.
     

  5. # At 8:35 PM, July 05, 2007, Anonymous Nick Griffin wrote:

    In future I will leave my name. You will be pleased to see I have updated my web site. Hope you again enjoy the read and look forward to your comments.
     

  6. # At 8:36 PM, July 05, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    I know you were only trying to be "well funny" - but I've removed your link to the BNP homepage; let's not give those cunts any more publicity than they have already, eh?
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Thursday, June 21, 2007

This video is perhaps less flashy than some similar sequences I've seen, but it is testament to how such a simple idea can still have the power to stagger the mind:

Responses to “Cepheis Matters” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Friday, June 15, 2007

JC

Deadwood was good. In fact it was excellent, often brilliant. But as with most television shows, it took a few episodes to click 100%. And so I used to tell people that, yes, of course it's very good and all that, but it's no Carnivale, West Wing or Firefly, you're an idiot for even suggesting it.

But at some undefined point during its run it somehow managed to sidle unnoticed into the same bracket of excellence in which I held these shows, so that when Rome started up I found myself telling people that, yes, of course, it's very good and all that, but it's no Deadwood, you must be some kind of fucking crazy person!

And then it ended, after three short seasons. Well-used by now to the fact of my favourite shows being cancelled, I reacted to this news with a mere, "fucking HBO", sighed and moved on. But not without making a mental note to watch out for what showrunner David Milch did next.

What he did next was unexpected. He signed up immediately for another HBO series, this one about a family of surfers - their trials, tribulations and, from the descriptions I'd read at least, what looked to be their tedious and interminable domestic squabbles. It's certainly not the kind of thing I'd normally go out of my way to watch, and I was in two minds whether to even bother with it. But Milch's record on NYPD Blue and, of course, Deadwood had earned him my attention for one episode at least, and so I tuned in (metaphorically-speaking; I'm in the UK after all) for its pilot without really looking forward to it.

John From Cincinnati certainly wasn't what I was expecting. It's either the most pretentious or the most intriguing show of the summer TV season, I can't decide. The show is in the main concerned with a legendary family of surfers, the Yosts, each with their own dreary-sounding issue to explore on a week-to-week basis: estrangement; senility; serious drug addiction – all the stock TV situations, ready off-the-shelf. Chief among the Yosts is ageing patriarch Mitch; his main concern is in actively shunning the celebrity and associated difficulties his former surfing glories have brought the family, preferring instead to spend his days practising his art (and make no mistake: he, and the show, see it very much as such) in seclusion, away from the prying eyes of shifty agents and even his own family.

But into this domestic dysfunction add the arrival of the Mysterious Stranger™ (the eponymous John, from Cincinnati presumably), a classic man-child with a gift for mimicry, and things start to look a little more interesting. Immediately befriending the family in a less-than-plausible manner, his appearance coincides with a number of strange, and possibly supernatural events.

Oh, and one or more or all of the characters may or may not be Jesus Christ. Now I wasn't expecting that.

The tone is a little uneven in places, one moment downbeat and sombre, the next purposefully eccentric (Teddy wipes out!), and this juxtaposition isn't as well-handled as it was during Deadwood's very occasional forays onto the same quirky ground, but for now it all makes for fascinating viewing. As I say, it could go either way – as one character remarks no less than five times, "some things I know and some things I don't" – but Milch has won my interest for one more episode at least.

Labels: ,

Responses to “John From Cincinnati” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Wednesday, May 30, 2007

I'm a bit late with this, but as of, er, now, I'll no longer be using my Plusnet e-mail address (steve@greatbeyond.plus.com). This is because after several years of happy service (and a couple maybe less happy), I've terminated my account with Plusnet and migrated to Sky.

I'll still check the old e-mail address from time to time, but I don't know how long it'll stay active now I've cancelled. Instead, for now please use the gmail address given on the sidebar on the right.

Oh, and I'm hoping to update this place with something a little more substantial soon, but don't hold your breath. I've been rather busy lately; unfortunately, not with a lot I can think of as interesting enough to blog about.

Responses to “E-mail Notification” (3)

  1. # At 11:08 AM, May 31, 2007, Anonymous Bob Pullen wrote:

    Hi there,

    Sorry to see you go :(

    Your email address will stay active as long as you log into it periodically. It will deactivate after 90 days otherwise.

    Rgds,

    Bob Pullen
    Plusnet Customer Support
     

  2. # At 2:52 PM, June 08, 2007, Anonymous Rob wrote:

    That's so not true!

    PlusNet deleted my email address less than 30 days after I left them.

    I was checking it every day via POP.
     

  3. # At 1:43 PM, June 15, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    "I was checking it every day via POP."

    Maybe you have to actively log into the member centre on the website. I've now made a note to do so at least once every few days.
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Friday, April 20, 2007

I didn't just see BBC News equating the first woman commentator in the history of Match of the Day with women's suffrage, did I? No, I really did just see that. Despite doing the job as capably and without fuss as her male colleagues on Radio Five for years now, the BBC has chosen to trumpet-blast Jacqui Oatley's forthcoming coverage of Saturday's Premiership game between Fulham and Blackburn with all the desperate boastfulness one comes to expect of the corporation nowadays. Ooh, look at us, aren't we so progressive?

Follow that up with a ham-fisted and earnest studio discussion and the denigration is surely complete. Only not, because, look: here's a clip of her commentating for another station! Oh good, because I was worried she wouldn't be up to the job, what with her being a bird and everything. FFS. I'm not sure who should feel more belittled: Jacqui Oatley - who looks uncomfortable at all the attention, surely preferring to just get on with it – or the Match of the Day audience this segment was obviously aimed at, desperate to convince that she can do the job just as well as a man, honest.

Surely true parity between the sexes will only have been achieved when something like this can happen without such a fuss being made. It's been turned into something now by the BBC, but given her regular appearances on Final Score and Radio Five, I guarantee that few would even have batted an eyelid were Gary Lineker to have handed off to Jacqui in the same understated manner as he does to any of the male commentators this Saturday. Indeed, my first reaction to the story this morning, before it dived headlong into a murky bog of condescension, was "oh, has she not appeared on the programme before? I can't say I'd noticed."

When even the notoriously self-congratulatory Hollywood finally awarded the Oscar to a black actor without pissing up its own back this year (unlike when they saw fit to grant the honour to Denzel in 2001, complete with pompous remarking at how truly enlightened they were), the BBC is without doubt several steps off the pace of change.

Responses to “Self-Aggrandising Twats” (4)

  1. # At 11:13 AM, April 20, 2007, Anonymous rich wrote:

    You been peeking in my brain? I was reminded of the 'black oscars' when I saw this this morning aswell.
     

  2. # At 11:36 AM, April 20, 2007, Anonymous anonymous wrote:

    A Premiership match? They might at least have saved her TV debut for the 1928 cup final, where the plucky gal could have really shown the fellas a thing or two!
     

  3. # At 12:00 PM, April 20, 2007, Anonymous NM wrote:

    I think it neither astonishing nor particularly marvellous that a woman commentates for football. Whether because of social contingency or biological essentialism, football is a substantial encapsulation of masculinity in its manifold (sic) forms. That it should be peculiar and notable that a woman should present it is just as peculiar and notable as when a token man presents Woman's Hour.

    Obviously, the BBC chose this woman to present it, just so they could pat themselves on the back, similarly to how Russell Davis (I won't give him the wanky aggrandisement of his T) makes his casting decision. It's not political correctness gone mad - it's political correctness gone banal.
     

  4. # At 8:43 AM, April 23, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    It may not be so much out of wanky self-aggrandisement, but of necessity. If there is another Russel Davies working in the British TV or film industry (as indeed there is), he may be required to credit himself with the "T" in order for the distinction to be made.
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Wednesday, April 11, 2007

#313

Should you lose an item, or be temporarily unaware of the location of a friend or colleague, under no circumstances should you joshingly state that, "he must have strayed into Iranian waters."

It was half-funny the first couple of times. Y'know, when I did it. But now, a couple of weeks after the event, it just makes you look like an unimaginative prick. For God's sake, give it another eight months or so and Radio 4's resident 'comedy' fucktards Punt and Dennis will be reeling that one out for the Christmas special, the twat-filled audience braying in blind, idiot appreciation at its topicality.

#314

"PCB Board" – I hear this every single frakking day at work. Without fail. In an office full of the most brilliant engineering minds Sheffield has to offer. Come on, people! Do I have to resort to administering Pavlovian conditioning to right this terrible wrong, kicking you in the balls with all my might every time you utter this wilful distortion of our dear language?

Yes. Yes, I think I do.

More blind rage next week, kids! (Grinding of gears optional).

Responses to “More Petty Annoyances” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Wednesday, April 04, 2007

A couple of reminders for those who care about such things, and to myself for that matter: the long-awaited sixth season of superb cop drama The Shield began last night, and should now be available from the usual sources.

It isn't actually the next season proper; these ten episodes were originally intended to form the second half of the fifth. They were held back until now presumably to give those involved in its production some time off; showrunner Shawn Ryan had previously expressed concern about maintaining the quality of the show while he divided his duties between this and his other hit, The Unit (which I haven't seen, though my brother assures me of its quality). Star Michael Chiklis has also been busy away from the show with other projects.

The seventh, concluding season, will air sometime in 2008.

Raines is another such long-delayed show. Originally slated for January, NBC finally saw fit to begin airing its first (and probably last) season a couple of weeks ago. Most of those who saw the pilot when it became available all the way back in September 2006 expressed their admiration for this superior detective drama. Including me.

Since then, significant changes have been made. For starters, NBC has cut the number of episodes from thirteen (standard for a mid-season replacement) to seven, which doesn't bode well for its longevity. And the sidekick/conscience role (previously occupied by Luis Guzmán in the pilot) has been recast, presumably due to the actor's availability than any sense that he was disliked by the focus groups. Madeleine Stowe has also joined the permanent cast, as a psychiatrist hired by Raines' worried boss to probe into his recent eccentric behaviour.

Unfortunately, the high standards set by the pilot have not wholly endured. The second episode, story-wise, is weak and predictable, a cliché-ridden affair reminiscent of Bones at its most lazy and patronising. And the show's hook (that of Raines' ability to converse with imaginary constructs of the dead) is a liability when planted clumsily into such infertile ground. Madeleine Stowe does bring a little class to her role, though it surely doesn't deserve it; her psychiatrist is a lazily-written stereotype for now. Hopefully she'll be given added dimension with subsequent appearances. Though with only five episodes remaining, the opportunities are diminishing.

But it's not all bad. When not focused on the disposable plot (some crap we've seen a thousand times before about Latino immigrants), the show shines. Never brighter than when Goldblum is on screen. He is utterly compelling and bags some great lines. His languid performance is the glue which seeps into the cracks and stops this episode from falling apart. He should be given his own show or something. Oh.

I'll continue to watch, but NBC's treatment of it notwithstanding, I can't see a future for this unless they figure out how to make proper use of the gimmick (which was fluffed both in this episode and to a certain extent in the pilot), and unless they get someone on board who can write a good mystery on which to hang it.

Labels:

Responses to “Reminders” (0)

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




Monday, March 19, 2007

It’s mid-season replacement time, which means a minor glut of yet more new television shows to ignore. I already did Raines last year, but two other new shows landed in my inbox at the weekend:

The Riches

Eddie Izzard and Minnie Driver star in a new hourlong drama (the pilot clocks in at 57 minutes) for the FX cable channel. Izzard plays the Father, Driver the Mother, to a family of thieving Gypsies. Literally: the pre-credits sequence shows the family grifting their way through a school reunion; while Izzard assumes the identity of a no-show, charming his way around the room with unmatched self-assurance, his son and daughter pick the pockets and handbags of the other attendees, who are too rapt with Izzard’s showboating to notice.

After faffing around for what seems an age with subplots of varying quality, the high-concept premise finally arrives with the abruptness of the car crash which heralds it. While on the run from Driver’s extended clan (for reasons too contrived to go into), the family accidentally kill a very wealthy couple (the eponymous "Riches") who were on their way to start a new life on the other side of the country.

Izzard’s reaction is to dump the evidence into a nearby lake and have his family assume the identities of the Riches, moving into their new home in a rich suburb to live their own warped version of the American Dream. Naturally.

But despite this ludicrousness, it isn’t a bad show. As expected, Izzard's American accent is all over the place, pitched somewhere between a Southern drawl and the one he employed to such, um, memorable effect in Mystery Men. It is distracting at times, but if you can get past that, he isn’t half bad here. The effortless charm he employs to win over his well-heeled neighbours does the same for the audience, and he gets the chance to shine during a couple of more reflective moments too.

Though I could have done without the gratuitous show of his bare arse during an unconvincing sex scene with Minnie Driver (who plays convincingly against type as his slightly more rough-hewn wife).

All in all, it’s not unenjoyable fare. If they can fix the problems with the wildly varying tone, it could very well be a winner. And while there are no mentions of jam to speak of, which will come as a disappointment to some, Minnie Driver's head does appear to have been replaced by a strawberry. Really.

Andy Barker, P.I.

22-minute sitcom in which a mild-mannered self-employed accountant, played by Andy Richter, is mistaken for a private detective on his first day in the office. "Hilarity ensues" when he gets mixed up in a case straight out of Chinatown, and finds he likes it a bit too much.

It’s inoffensive enough; Richter is likeable in the lead, and there are some ideas with a bit of potential: the Afghan restaurateur next door who, after 9/11, went a bit too far to prove his love of the US by decking out his entire eatery in garish stars, stripes and imperfectly-translated patriotic slogans, and the video-store owner's "we don’t have Meet the Fokkers".

But that’s probably all it is at the moment: a bunch of nice ideas with potential. Actual laugh-out-loud moments are thin on the ground; it produces good-natured smiles more than anything. And despite having a large enough budget to stage a convincing car chase, the rest of the production feels a little amateurish and, in places, just cheap.

I’m told the subsequent episodes up the joke-quotient significantly, so it may be worth sticking with, especially considering dearth of decent sitcoms currently on offer. At present, only Scrubs finds itself on my must-watch list. Andy Barker, P.I. probably won’t, but it's done just enough with this pilot to get a second chance.

Labels: ,

Responses to “Embarrassment Of” (2)

  1. # At 8:18 AM, March 20, 2007, Anonymous Anonymous wrote:

    Izzard. Good. Acting. These words dont mix!!
     

  2. # At 10:19 AM, March 20, 2007, Blogger Wilko wrote:

    I'm not saying he's brilliant in The Riches, or anything like that. As I said, the accent really is all over the place.

    "Surprisingly good" would be a fitting enough description, I think.
     

Post a Comment

Collapse comments




About

    Wilko is a thoroughly unremarkable human being. You may contact him here:

    liquidfinale {[at]} gmail.com

    But you probably already knew that and the real reason you haven't been in touch lately is you couldn't be bothered to make the effort. Go on, admit it. No-one will blame you.




wilkinsonswords | K2 theme by GeckoandFly.
Powered by Blogger.com